Legislature(2011 - 2012)BARNES 124
02/08/2012 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HJR29 | |
HB9 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | HB 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | HJR 29 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HJR 29-BLM LEGACY OIL WELL CLEAN UP 1:04:17 PM CO-CHAIR SEATON announced that the first order of business would be HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 29, Urging the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, to plug legacy wells properly and to reclaim the legacy well sites as soon as possible in order to protect the environment in the Arctic region. 1:05:15 PM REPRESENTATIVE CHARISSE MILLETT, Alaska State Legislature, prime sponsor, predicted that by bringing up the subject of legacy wells HJR 29 will result in big impacts on the state of Alaska because it will lead to discussions and agreements with the federal government about the wells. She explained that between 1944 and 1981 approximately 136 wells were drilled in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A). Some were drilled by the U.S. Navy and some by the U.S. Geological Survey. Some of the wells are being used as climate change mechanisms, but an extraordinary number of these wells have not been capped or mitigated at all. This has caused a lot of issues to arise with the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) because the wells pose a risk to both wildlife and human life. The well sites are unattractive with many barrels around them. Some wells can no longer be found because they were just bore holes, or have eroded, or have [sunken] into lakes. This is a black eye on Alaska even though those wells were drilled by the federal government. Therefore, HJR 29 urges the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to take responsibility and continue with mitigation of the wells. 1:07:20 PM REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT said she introduced HJR 29 because the squeaky wheel gets the grease. There is disagreement between BLM and AOGCC regarding how many wells have been capped, but she said she thinks there are about 110 wells that are worrisome, 42 that are very worrisome, and she would like to see some movement. She conveyed that according to the BLM, getting money for this type of thing is difficult to do, especially without the earmark process. However, Alaskans and the legislature can take a lead in encouraging Congress to clean up these wells. Creative solutions have been proposed to the BLM, such as giving the land to the State of Alaska and then the state would clean up the wells. She related that some producers have said they would take over the mitigation costs if they could lease the land for exploration. REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT reiterated that the resolution would start a dialogue amongst Alaskans, Congress, and BLM. She would like to see the wells capped, mitigated, and [the land put] back in the pristine condition that the state relies on its producers to do. If any private producer left wells like these anywhere in Alaska, the environmental groups would be screaming. She said she has reached out to 24 environmental groups urging them to get behind this cause, but has had little feedback. When a "thimble of oil" is dropped on the North Slope it becomes a front page story, but the NPR-A wells have yet to be a front page story and only two articles have been written about the issue. Raising awareness of these wells that have not been remediated over the past 60 years is a long time in coming, and it is sickening the way the lands have been left. CO-CHAIR SEATON concurred that this is an important topic for everyone. 1:10:01 PM REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON remarked how dare [the federal government] request Alaska to do things when it does not do those things itself. REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT responded that this is in Alaska's backyard. The federal government controls and restricts Alaska on every aspect of development in the state, yet this is the legacy that the federal government has left Alaska. 1:10:35 PM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI thanked the sponsor for bringing forward the resolution. In regard to the third [whereas] on page 2, he inquired whether any of the unplugged legacy wells have damaged the surface vegetation, groundwater, fish, land mammals, and sea mammals. REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT replied that it is hard to equate because not a lot of travel is done on the NPR-A. The North Slope Borough has taken over some of the wells, she said, so the borough could be contacted about the wells, the land transfer, and the responsibility that now lies with the borough. However, right now it is out in the wilderness. There is open diesel, but no one is studying water contamination, so the effects on wildlife will not be known until there is someone monitoring it. 1:11:47 PM REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER thanked the sponsor for raising this issue and writing the resolution. She shared that this issue has been raised by many legislators when meeting with federal officials in Washington, DC, but the officials have always pleaded poverty and no money for amelioration. Noting the various people to whom the resolution would be sent, she asked whether there are others who should receive the resolution given that funding is what is needed. REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT agreed HJR 29 should go to everyone that can be thought of, including every member of Congress and every environmental organization. She said she would be accepting of any suggestions from Representative Gardner regarding who the resolution should be sent to. 1:13:04 PM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI asked whether well reclamation efforts between the years 1944 and 1981 were not properly understood and the requirements under law at that time were done, but now the wells are out of compliance because the laws have changed since then. REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT concurred, but said that just as there are legacy wells in other areas of the state that have been drilled since 1959, the owner/operator of that well is still required to make the well right to standards of today. It is a case of what is good for one group of people should be good for all groups of people. Anyone drilling in Alaska should be responsible for the legacy that it leaves. 1:14:05 PM CO-CHAIR FEIGE, observing that reporters were in the committee room, said that maybe the press would pick up the story. He requested the sponsor to review who she talked to regarding the aforementioned land swap, and presumed that such a land swap would include the subsurface as well as the surface. REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT deferred to AOGCC commissioner Cathy Foerster to provide the specific details because it was AOGCC that was involved in these talks. 1:14:48 PM REPRESENTATIVE HERRON suggested that the resolution be sent to the boards of the Sierra Club, World Wildlife Fund, and all other non-governmental organizations (NGOs) so that the boards of the organizations could decide, not the executive director. REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT replied that the resolution has been sent, but sending the actual resolution, if it passes, is a great idea. The more that awareness can be raised about this issue, the more likely it will become a front page story. REPRESENTATIVE HERRON suggested the committee work with the sponsor to add all of those NGOs to the mailing list. CO-CHAIR SEATON said that could come forward as an amendment when the committee is considering amendments. 1:16:36 PM REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON commented that a way to get front page news is for the State of Alaska to tell the federal government that it will not pay any more money until something is done. She inquired whether the sponsor has spoken to the governor about how far he is willing to go regarding this issue. REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT responded that the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) is aware of this issue. She allowed she probably has not given enough credit to the Alaska contingent of the BLM, which has made this issue its number one priority. She acknowledged that the Alaska BLM's hands are tied through the federal appropriations process and said the wells in Alaska are competing with many other sites around the U.S. from the 1940s. Unfortunately, the State of Alaska cannot force the federal government to abide by state law or pay fines. She pointed out that offshore NPR-A lease sales have brought the federal government $9 billion, but not a cent of that has been re-appropriated back to this area. 1:18:19 PM REPRESENTATIVE DICK commented that if environmental groups really are concerned about cleaning up the environment this should be a number one priority. But, if environmental groups are only concerned about locking up land, then he can see where the land is already locked up and there really is not a motive to do anything further here. He said it seems to him that if environmental groups really do get on board with the sponsor that is proof that they really do care about cleaning up the environment; if they do not, then maybe their motives should be questioned. CO-CHAIR SEATON reminded members that the resolution is a communication from the legislature and the governor, if it passes and the governor signs it. He said he agrees it should be sent to parties that should be interested, but questions their named involvement in a resolution from the legislature. REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT offered her appreciation for the committee's consideration of HJR 29 and said that as awareness is raised it ensures that folks doing business in Alaska will be expected to do it right and within the letter of the law. The legacy wells on the NPR-A send a mixed message to people about how pristine Alaska's environment is. Maybe the squeaky well will get the cap. 1:21:10 PM REPRESENTATIVE FOSTER inquired about the estimated cost for plugging an open well. REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT answered that the BLM has provided two numbers - one for complete remediation and one for plugging. These two different things can be done separately or at the same time, she explained, but she does not have a total number. The most concern is just plugging the open wells. The last well cost around $16 million for that one well one time. Ideas have been floated that a group of wells could be plugged at the same time which would lower the cost [per well]. However, there is no real handle on the total package of what it would cost to do remediation. CO-CHAIR SEATON moved to testimony from representatives of AOGCC and BLM. 1:22:59 PM CATHERINE FOERSTER, Engineering Commissioner, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC), thanked the committee for allowing her to testify in support of HJR 29. She said this subject has been dear to her since becoming a commissioner in 2005. Responding to Representative Kawasaki's earlier question, she said some of these wells were drilled after 1959, which was when the AOGCC came into being and established proper requirements for plugging and abandonment (P&A); therefore, the wells drilled after that were out of compliance with AOGCC regulations. In response to Representative Foster's earlier question, she said that so far the cost per well for the BLM's "attempts" to P&A and remediate has averaged $4.6 million per site. She noted that she is saying "attempts" because BLM claims to have plugged and abandoned and remediated more wells than AOGCC acknowledges as having been done properly, so there is a dispute in this regard. Responding to Representative Gardner's earlier question, Ms. Foerster said that her sister- in-law has suggested that today's PowerPoint presentation be put on YouTube as a way to reach more people. Addressing Co-Chair Feige's earlier question, she offered her understanding that the land swap was grassroots to granite, so the mineral and surface rights were swapped as was the remediation obligation. Thus, the North Slope Borough now has responsibility for 33 of the 136 wells. 1:25:29 PM REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER, in regard to the [state] leasing this land for development, inquired what confidence could be had that the state would not face a similar situation for any new wells that are drilled, given the previous defiance of AOGCC's regulations. MS. FOERSTER replied that AOGCC has not had any problems with any operators in the state of Alaska other than the federal government. She added that the federal government is not taking out any leases from AOGCC and has not come to AOGCC in the last year and a half for a permit to drill. 1:26:36 PM MS. FOERSTER began reviewing the photographs in her PowerPoint presentation, explaining that between the mid-1940s and the early 1980s the federal government drilled numerous wells in northern Alaska to test the viability of oil and gas development in the arctic environment. She said these legacy wells are all in the western North Slope, an area with geography and biology like that of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). While the area the wells are in is called a national petroleum reserve rather than a national wildlife refuge, that does not make what has happened there okay. MS. FOERSTER related that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), within the U.S. Department of Interior, is the agency that operates these wells. While the BLM is not the operator that drilled the wells, it has been assigned responsibility by the federal government to manage these wells. Essentially every one of the 136 wells has been out of compliance with Alaska regulations at one time or another and most of them still are. Given the condition of these wells, review of the applicable federal regulations would likely reveal that they are not even in compliance with the regulations of the entity that owns and manages them. 1:28:09 PM MS. FOERSTER prefaced that she will be covering only the most troubling issues, not every issue, that AOGCC has with these wells. Displaying the photo labeled "Solid waste primarily in the form of empty drums litter the area around Skull Cliff Core Test," she pointed out that the objects in the picture are not caribou or musk ox, but rusting barrels and drums. While the BLM says there is insufficient budget to clean up these hundreds of rusting drums, it has a big enough budget to rent a helicopter to fly out and take pictures of the drums. She suggested that the next time the BLM is out taking pictures it should bring along a big net, gather up the drums, and carry them out. Additionally, she continued, while the BLM does not have enough money to clean up its mess, it has enough money to write a report about it; this picture and the others she will be showing are taken from a BLM report that used to be on the agency's web site. MS. FOERSTER urged that as members view these pictures, they consider the hypocrisy of the federal government in wanting to protect the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from the very sort of mess that the federal government has caused, and is allowing to continue, elsewhere in Alaska. 1:29:46 PM MS. FOERSTER allowed that to be fair to the federal government and current administration, the legacy wells have been a problem since the middle of the last century and are not solely the fault of the current administration. However, because this administration is the only one in place now, it is the only one that the state can hold accountable. Also, to be fair to the Alaska BLM folks who are Alaskans too, she said she thinks that they would like to clean up the mess as well, but their hands are tied by their meager annual budget of about $1 million, which enables them to write a report and take pictures and not much else. However, she stressed, she is not going to cut the federal government any slack because it takes in billions of dollars from Alaska lease sales and some of that money should come back to Alaska to fix this mess. She shared that when making this presentation to the Ground Water Protection Council, a group of state and federal regulators from across the U.S., she asked that people in the audience stand up if the picture depicted a proper P&A and remediate; no one, including representatives of the BLM, stood up for any of the pictures. 1:31:11 PM MS. FOERSTER, moving to the photo labeled "North Simpson #1 is partially submerged in the summer," stated that in Alaska the proper plugging and abandonment of wells is governed by Article 2 of AOGCC regulations. The purpose of properly plugging and abandoning wells includes public safety, protection of the environment, and protection of sources of drinking water. She asked, rhetorically, whether anyone would want to take a drink from the lake in the photo. MS. FOERSTER stated that proper plugging and abandonment of a well includes sufficient downhole cement and plugs to ensure that underground fluids cannot migrate. With few exceptions, none of the [136] legacy wells complies with this requirement. Turning to the photo labeled "Simpson Core #29," she noted that the well is open to the surface with no downhole plugs at all and with no wellhead. The mud or diesel that was probably in the well at one time has likely gone into the environment. The earlier question about whether there has been damage to the environment can be answered by looking at the pictures of these wells. Several of the wells were left filled with diesel, she said, and she thinks this is one of them, although she is not sure. 1:32:25 PM MS. FOERSTER, displaying the photo labeled "Light trash is present in the seep between Cores #30 and #30A," explained that the well was drilled in a seep, so the oil on the surface is a naturally occurring seep. Proper plugging and abandonment of a well requires that all underground pipe be cut off five feet below ground level so that it cannot create an excavation hazard or become a problem during subsidence or other normal earth movement. With few exceptions, she said, none of the legacy wells complies with this requirement. MS. FOERSTER, moving to the photo labeled "Awuna wellhead with exposed wooden pilings and Styrofoam," stated that this picture has been used in mailers and fundraisers opposing development of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. She said the oil industry was probably blamed for this well and this is another part of the legacy that these wells are leaving for Alaska. Properly plugging and abandonment of a well requires sufficient surface remediation that the site blends in with the natural vegetation, and within a few seasons there should be no surface indication of a well's location. Many of the legacy well sites are permanent eyesores littered with rotting wood, rusting metal, and other debris. However, because the legacy wells have not been properly plugged, those wells that are re-vegetated are potentially more serious downhole mechanical integrity issues because they are out of site and out of mind but not secured. She said the helicopter shown in this picture re-emphasizes that the BLM has enough money to rent helicopters. 1:33:52 PM MS. FOERSTER pointed out that the delay in plugging and abandonment has caused at least three of the wells to be lost due to subsidence and other normal earth movement. The BLM has taken these wells off its concern list because it can no longer find them, she said. Two of the wells are at the bottom of what subsidence and snowmelt have turned into lakes and the third has been buried by a landslide. Additionally, wells can simply be no longer found and there is no explanation for why. Postponing the abandonment of these wells simply puts the remainder of them at risk of also becoming lost. Losing a well does not mean that it is no longer a mechanical integrity or environmental concern; it is just one that cannot be seen. She explained that the [Awuna well] is on its way to being lost as the subsidence lake develops. How long before it is lost, she asked, and how much will it cost to find and fix it after that happens. MS. FOERSTER, turning to the photo labeled "East Simpson #2 is partially submerged during the spring thaw," noted that the question with this legacy well is how long will it take for natural subsidence to submerge this site completely and what will be the cost to find it and fix it in the middle of a lake. 1:35:15 PM MS. FOERSTER, displaying the photo labeled "Kaolak #1 with cabin on the drill pad," asserted that allowing these unsafe and unsightly wells to litter Alaska's wilderness while threatening both human safety and the environment is unacceptable. Nonetheless, BLM has properly plugged and abandoned fewer than 10 of the 136 wells. If these wells were operated by an oil company the AOGCC would force compliance with its regulations and impose fines for non-compliance, she said. Unfortunately, while BLM can be found in violation of AOGCC regulations, AOGCC has no legal authority to force the U.S. Department of Interior into compliance. Additionally, she continued, AOGCC should not have to. Showing the photo labeled "Umiat #1 is located about 5 miles from the Umiat airstrip," she said the federal government should provide adequate funding specifically designated for the purpose of bringing its own wells into regulatory compliance with its and AOGCC's regulations. This funding could come from the billions of dollars collected in lease sales or from stimulus efforts. For example, jobs could have been given to displaced Gulf of Mexico workers after the Macondo disaster to come to Alaska and plug and abandon these wells. MS. FOERSTER reiterated Representative Millett's earlier statement that oil companies are interested in leasing these lands and to have the remediation be part of their leasing. There are opportunities to make these problems go away, she said, and making this happen is a part of her job. She vowed that as long as she is with AOGCC she will be haranguing to make it happen. She cannot force the BLM into compliance, but she can embarrass them in the court of public opinion and find and work with the reasonable people to try to move this forward. 1:37:17 PM REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER inquired whether the information gained when these wells were drilled is in the public domain or available to potential lessors. MS. FOERSTER responded that AOGCC has scant records on these wells and she does not know how much information the BLM has; however, anything that AOGCC has is available to the public. REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON suggested that the resolution could be amended with a whereas clause asking the BLM to provide the state with the information that the agency has on these wells. She inquired about the cabin depicted in the photo labeled "Kaolak#1 with cabin on the drill pad." MS. FOERSTER answered that as far as she knows the cabin was part of the activity around that well. She expressed her optimism that the Alaska BLM representatives and the AOGCC will collaborate moving forward with the legacy wells and that BLM will provide AOGCC with whatever information it has. She said she is therefore unsure that such a whereas clause is necessary. 1:39:22 PM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI asked how many of the approximately 2,200 legacy wells on the North Slope are not currently in compliance with AOGCC's regulations for capping. MS. FOERSTER replied that the BLM is by far the biggest violator of AOGCC's regulations. Many, many wells on the North Slope are long-term shut-in wells on active pads, she continued, and these are looked at every day by operators. A handful of wells needing cleanup are located in exploratory sites and AOGCC has given notice to those operators and the operators are proceeding. Two or three wells between Anchorage and Fairbanks, the Rosetta wells, are true orphan wells for which AOGCC cannot find the owners. Other than the Rosetta wells, the only ones that have not been remediated are a few Point Thomsen exploratory wells that ExxonMobil and BP admit they own and admit they owe remediation. However, due to high pressure in the Thomsen reservoir and the way that those wells were left because it was thought at the time that they would be re-entered soon, re-entering the wells for plugging and abandonment poses severe dangers that the companies do not know how to get around. The wells are partially plugged and abandoned, so they are not an immediate environmental risk. It would be a far greater risk to go in without a thoroughly prepared plan, which the companies and AOGCC are working on. 1:42:12 PM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI, in regard to AOGCC rules about whether a gravel pad is still active, inquired whether AOGCC actually looks to see if a pad qualifies as active. He said it seems to him that a company not wanting to do remediation could just keep leasing the ground and say that it is actively monitoring that site. MS. FOERSTER clarified that an active pad is producing, so oil and gas production is coming from that pad. MS. FOERSTER, responding to Co-Chair Feige, said she joined AOGCC nearly seven years ago at the end of March 2005. CO-CHAIR FEIGE asked how many wells the BLM has drilled in Alaska over the past seven years. MS. FOERSTER responded she does not have an exact count for the last seven years, but a handful of coalbed methane test wells have been drilled in or near the city of Wainwright since her arrival at AOGCC. One well was drilled before she arrived and a few more were drilled after she arrived. CO-CHAIR FEIGE inquired whether BLM followed all of the AOGCC regulations that it was supposed to follow. MS. FOERSTER answered no, it did not. 1:44:11 PM REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ offered her appreciation for Ms. Foerster's work to raise awareness of this issue. She asked what the [federal] government's original purpose was for drilling these wells. MS. FOERSTER replied that the original purpose was to find out whether oil and gas drilling was viable in an arctic environment. Geologists had long recognized the North Slope as an oil-rich area and after World War II the U.S. wanted to ensure its own energy security. So, it was exploration, but as seen by the surface oil seeps in her presentation it was not hard to imagine that the area was oil rich. She added that the exploration was very shallow. REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ inquired whether the [federal] government has ever used any of the resources there for military activity or other purposes. MS. FOERSTER responded she does not know and deferred to the BLM to answer the question. REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked whether the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been involved or notified. MS. FOERSTER answered that the Alaska EPA has been informed of this and has offered its moral support to AOGCC. When she made her presentation at the Ground Water Protection Council, several federal EPA people in attendance were aghast and offered suggestions to her that AOGCC has already tried. Thus, EPA is aware of the issue, but has not made the issue its mission. REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER inquired about the current condition of the BLM's coalbed methane wells. MS. FOERSTER replied that those wells have been abandoned. In further response, she said the wells are plugged and abandoned, and that it was not AOGCC's abandonment regulations that the BLM did not follow. 1:47:31 PM TED MURPHY, Deputy State Director of Resources, Division of Resources, Alaska State Office, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, stated that he is before the committee to answer questions on the legacy well program within Alaska. He said he thinks the BLM is on track to continue working closely with the state to reach resolution, a common understanding of where the wells are at, the condition the wells are in, and how to remediate and plug those wells into the future. Collaboration is the component that everyone needs to do to get this done. CO-CHAIR SEATON asked whether Mr. Murphy disagrees with the facts as they have been presented or that the pictures do not truly represent the situation around the wells. MR. MURPHY responded that the pictures are an accurate reflection of the condition of the wells. He said the federal government does not control 136 wells in the NPR-A. Some of those were conveyed in the Barrow Gas Field Transfer Act [of 1984] and some of those wells, while called wells, are actually cores or shallow wells that were never cased. They were used to determine the thickness of the permafrost and maybe some geologic structures. They may have ranged anywhere from a couple hundred feet to nearly a thousand feet. CO-CHAIR SEATON requested Mr. Murphy to provide the committee with a written commentary about the number of wells and the type of wells. 1:50:13 PM REPRESENTATIVE HERRON requested Mr. Murphy to say "mia culpa" on behalf of the BLM and the federal government. MR. MURPHY stated "mia culpa." REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER, in regard to Mr. Murphy's statement that BLM is working closely with the state to reach common understanding, inquired what the active parts are of working closely. MR. MURPHY answered that it begins with the 2004 report on the legacy wells that he put back on the BLM's web site yesterday. He said BLM is making an amendment to that report. He explained that some of the pictures shown earlier are a re-visitation of those wells and it is important to understand that the BLM has chosen to address those wells being impacted by coastal erosion and that would have been overrun by the ocean in the near future. Those wells were plugged and the mud pits remediated. REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER understood Mr. Murphy to be saying that the wells likely to be impacted by coastal erosion or that have been impacted by coastal erosion have been plugged and remediated. MR. MURPHY said yes, within the next five years. The BLM does not have an accurate representation of what the coastal erosion impacts will be into the future, but the BLM has addressed the ones that will be overrun or have been overrun by the ocean. 1:52:19 PM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI offered his understanding that 12 wells have been plugged since the 2004 inventory, one in 2010 at the cost of $17 million and Umiat #9 that was plugged in 2011 at a cost of $2.5 million. In regard to reassessment of the 2004 inventory, he asked what the process will be for determining which wells should be first. He further asked when the BLM will get done. MR. MURPHY replied he does not know when BLM will be done as it is contingent on a number of factors, but he is committed to BLM continuing to address the problem. He outlined the screening process that will occur: condition of the existing pad and pits; visible solid waste, such as equipment, piping, and barrels; whether the bore hole penetrated known oil and gas stratigraphy; whether the well had an oil or gas show and, if so, is the well capable of flowing; whether the well is near human activity and, if so, whether it is a risk to the people near the well; the condition of the wellhead and whether there has been previous problems or repair work on that wellhead; and whether the presence of the unplugged well has the potential to negatively impact anticipated development. 1:54:11 PM CO-CHAIR FEIGE allowed that much of this happened before Mr. Murphy came onboard the BLM and that Mr. Murphy is working towards a solution. As far as the solutions of removing pits and reclaiming the wells being impacted by coastal erosion, he said the BLM is keeping pilots like him employed. He said he is disturbed by the BLM's failure to follow existing AOGCC regulations for the wells drilled near Wainwright. While he did not know whether that was a willful disregard of the regulations or simply a lack of knowledge or expertise on the part of the people that were doing those wells, he asked that Mr. Murphy pass on to the federal government that the state does not take kindly to the violation of its laws. REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ inquired what the top federal agency funding priorities are for Alaska and where this remediation effort fits into those priorities. MR. MURPHY explained that the Alaska BLM budget is based upon the conveyance program, which is the largest funded program within BLM Alaska, followed by the oil and gas "1310 program" and then the recreational components. As far as priorities, the annual budget for the legacy well program is a base of $1 million and supplementals are addressed thereafter. CO-CHAIR SEATON requested the committee members to submit any other questions they may have and that BLM provide in writing any disputes it has with HJR 29 so the committee may address them. CO-CHAIR SEATON held over HJR 29.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 9 Version U.pdf |
HRES 2/6/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/24/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/27/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
HB 9 Sectional, version U.pdf |
HRES 2/6/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/24/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/27/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
HB 9 Sponsor Statement- version U.pdf |
HRES 2/6/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/24/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
Amendment1-RES.pdf |
HRES 2/6/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
Amendment 2-RES.pdf |
HRES 2/6/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
HB 9.pdf |
HRES 2/6/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/24/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
HB 9 Fact Sheet.docx |
HRES 2/6/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/24/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
AGDC Legislative Recommendations.pdf |
HRES 2/6/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
2002 Ballot Measure 3, Section 1.docx |
HRES 2/6/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
HB 369.pdf |
HRES 2/6/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
HJR 29.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
HJR 29 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
HJR 29 BLM Legacy Wells.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
HJR 29 BLM Legacy Well Pictures.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
HJR 29 AOGCC - legacy well non-compliance.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
HJR 29 AOGCC - legacy well white paper.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
HJR 29 Support Letter RDC.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM |
|
ANGDA - H Res Comm 02812.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
HB 9 ANGDA e-mail.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
Executed ROW Lease 072006.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
HJR 29 email support Mayor Hugo 02072012.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 29 |
Subsection G-New.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
Avoid Duplications.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |
HRES Response.pdf |
HRES 2/8/2012 1:00:00 PM HRES 2/10/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 9 |